Emperial Rome vs Han Essay

The definitive Period was a time where large, land-based empires were developed. The leaders of these empires were met with many questions on how to check up on their territories. piece of music both the Han empire and purple capital of Italy usaged political control over their empires through and through government structure, they differed in their validation of bureaucrats and their conviction on slavery. Both the Han and Imperial capital of Italy used political control through same government structure. The Han emperor, who was believed to be the Mandate of enlightenment, had absolute power over any of his people.They relied heavily on their instruct bureaucrats, the Shi, to fill aside lawful duties. This reliance was back up by Confucian ways and stabilize the empire. Imperial capital of Italy also sound having a singular ruler to control the whole. The papistical emperor also was believed to nonplus power over the citizens of capital of Italy. The Romans also h ad their accept class of bureaucrats who were valued highly. This social social stratification unified capital of Italy as a country. Both Han and Imperial Rome relied on social hierarchy to help with practice political control over their empires.They full this structure because it unified power in the state and lessened the amount of chaos. The Han relied on their bureaucratic class of trained officials to exercise political control whereas in Rome bureaucracy was given as a re ward to returned war heroes. The Hans bureaucrats, the Shi, were trained in the Confucian ways. This made the officials often reliable and prone to do the chasten thing. The Shi were also taught to embody the law and visit it in the state. This regularity of lead by example helped citizens strive to do their best.If the citizens were all(a) hoping to be a better man, the baseball club as a whole would be a better place. The Hans bureaucrats were ran to a greater extent on a basis of invest in the ir behavior than the Romans. This method of trust in the bureaucrats was heavily support by the Confucian teachings and their training in becoming better men. In Imperial Rome, bureaucracy was given to returned warriors. Rome hoped that by rewarding good soldiers there would be more relish to go represent in a war and succeed.These bureaucrats obligate the laws rather than embodying them. They werent reliable, but were exclamatory enough to get the job through by using fear to come to the citizens behave and do as the laws said. The bureaucracy was given to the returned war heroes as a reward for their accomplishments in battles. This gave soldiers more desire to campaign and do well in wars so that when they returned they would be honored for their accomplishments. The Han relied more on trust to carry out their political control than Imperial Rome did.The Hans trained their bureaucrats to blade them more honorable and faithful to their ruler. in time, Rome utilise their winning soldiers because they fought in many wars they needed indigence for their soldiers to go be successful and to fight bravely and honorably. While both civilizations had slaves, Han chinaware didnt rely greatly on their slaves however in Imperial Rome slaves were a critical and indispensable part of the society. In Chinese societies slaves were use in general for at home chores such as cooking, cleaning, or going shopping.Even without slaves perform these domestic tasks, the Han couldve survived. Also, slaves in mainland China were do by less harshly than those in Rome. The slaves in China were allowed to refuse certain tasks that were non included in their contract when they freshman signed to their owner without fearing a gruelling beating. Lastly, China had an overall more easy view on their slaves. The owners in Han were non as strict or cruel. However in Imperial Rome, slaves were mostly captured war prisoners who were being punished.This led to harsh punishmen t of the slaves to make sure they behaved and did as told. Slaves began doing a majority of the physical labor in Imperial Rome which made them an summation to the Roman society. If Rome were to lose their slaves, the miserliness would crumble and the empire would fall. Finally, some Roman slaves were given high titles, such as lawyers or doctors. So to lose these slaves would be to lost tons of profit. Both societies used slaves, but Imperial Rome was lots more reliant on their slaves than Han China was.The Hans didnt rely on slaves much because they knew that they werent reliable and if they kept a strong hold on them they would originate and cause the fall of the empire. However, Rome used the method of scaring their slaves into doing the right thing. If the slaves feared a unappeasable beating they would be sure to make the right decisions and follow directions. In both Han China and Imperial Rome government structure was used to help exercise political control, however they differed on their organization of bureaucracy and their reliance on slavery.